[Talk-GB] Southwark update

[Peter Miller]

On 3 March 2011 09:51, Richard Mann <richard.mann.westoxford at gmail.com>wrote:

> blue-red is the standard for cold-hot display, though it's being
> displaced by red/amber/green in most management reporting.
>
> I might add green for those who've got to the blissful state of 100%
>
>
We must not forget those 10% of men who are red/green colourblind which is
why we used blue not green.


> I hope you update the algorithm to recognize all highway tags soon.
> Oxford's never going to get above 99.87% until you do.
>
>
We aim to do that within the next week.


> I think you might also consider a path density map or a
> shop/pub:street density map. That's the sort of stuff where OSM can
> really do much better than OS / Google.
>
>
Paths are certainly possible and we have some interesting stuff brewing on
that which will be available to use in the next few weeks if all goes well.

Re points of interest, we still don't have nodes in our database
unfortunately. Importing them is on our 'to-do' list pretty soon and then we
will certainly be able to to shop and pub type analysis.

Regards,


Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd



> Richard
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Peter Miller <peter.miller at itoworld.com>
> wrote:
> > Great to see all the progress in London.
> >
> > We should also note that person (or persons unknown) have been beavering
> > away in Scotland which is now 50%+ in all areas and the Edinburgh-Glasgow
> > corridor is 95%+ complete almost from coast to coast.
> >
> > I (and a few other people) have been plugging away heading east from
> Ipswich
> > since Xmas. Building on everyone elses good work we have now nearly
> joined
> > the Suffolk coast to B'ham with a solid strip of blue. Suffolk is
> completely
> > Blue and Cambridgeshire is nearly there. The next challenge will be join
> > that strip to Greater London through Bedfordshire and Herts.
> >
> > It has just occurred to me are our colours ('blue', 'red') too overtly
> > political? Suffolk went 'completely blue' in the last general election!
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Peter Miller
> > ITO World
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2 March 2011 13:28, Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Following Steve's happy email about Enfield, we now have Southwark up to
> >> 100% accuracy against OS Locator with 56 (!) discrepancies identified in
> the
> >> OS data, compared to 9 in Enfield.
> >>
> >> We're also plowing ahead with buildings, and have perhaps 1/2 to 2/3rds
> of
> >> the borough's buildings now traced, with a big chunk my way in East
> >> Dulwich/Peckham also fully addressed.
> >>
> >> I see Barnet is also up to 100% - congrats! That takes us up to 9 local
> >> authorities in the UK with 100% accuracy.
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://tom.acrewoods.net   http://twitter.com/tom_chance
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-GB mailing list
> >> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20110303/a4421739/attachment.html>