[Talk-GB] C roads

[Steve Doerr]

On 18/05/2011 17:33, Ed Avis wrote:
> Craig Wallace<craigw84 at ...>  writes:
>
>> There is a proposed unsigned=yes tag on
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Noname
>> But that is not very helpful, as it doesn't specify whether it is the
>> ref or the name (or something else) that is unsigned. Something like
>> unsigned:name=yes or unsigned:ref=yes would be better.
> I think this is a good idea, with plain unsigned=yes taken to mean that neither
> the name nor the ref or any other unique identification is signed.

But sooner or later someone will tag something as unsigned=no. Double 
negatives seem faintly ridiculous to me. Why not replace unsigned=yes 
with signed=no? Seems more logical to me.

-- 
Steve