[Talk-GB] Essex appearing in various London address nominatim results

[Ed Loach]

Martin wrote:

> >>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/26450045
> 
> >>I think there will be a polygon for Essex, thus the above node
can
> simply
> >>be deleted. This is the case in a lot of similar cases, as more
exact
> >>data is now available."

Ed Avis replied:
 
> It has been discussed and agreed on this list before that these
> nodes can be
> junked now that we have county boundaries as polygons.  So please
> go ahead.

In case it was also a contributory factor, the two Essex boundary
relations (administrative and ceremonial) weren't closed - I've just
joined the ends together so they should be OK now. This might also
fix Cambridgeshire but I haven't checked those relations with the
relation analyser.

Links:
Fixed here: http://osm.org/go/0EQLGf@WA--
Essex relations analysed from
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Essex

I have not deleted the Essex county node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/26450045
as I wasn't sure whether the gns information was something that
first needed moving to one or both of the Essex relations.

Ed