[Talk-GB] Should highway=byway be deprecated?
phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Wed Aug 22 14:50:08 BST 2012
I have seen Byway signs in Wiltshire in the past few months.
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 22/08/2012 14:21 SomeoneElse wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
> is there an out of copyright source for the two different types of
> byway: restricted_byway & byway_open_to_all_traffic?
I'd imagine that the same applies as for other public rights of way - in
some places there may be something made available which is OK
licence-wise; in other areas not. There was an attempt a few months ago
to try and rustle up a few more areas (on this list I believe).
> If not, as many are signed on the ground as just 'byway', I'm not sure
> highway=byway should be deprecated. How are users distinguishing what
> type they are?
There are two issues here. One is whether "highway=byway" actually
helps describe what sort of highway it is. I'd argue that it doesn't,
and that "highway=service/track/something else as appropriate" + some
descriptive tags would be better, along with
The other is whether it makes sense to map something that's labelled
"byway" as " "designation=byway_open_to_all_traffic" or
"designation=byway". I've never yet found* something labelled "byway"
that isn't actually a BOAT, so I haven't complained when people have
come along and tried to standardise "designation=byway" to
* mostly in the East Mids - other areas may vary!
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB