[Talk-GB] License change & anonymous edits

[Ed Avis]

Frederik Ramm <frederik at ...> writes:

>saying "yes, 80n did have intellectual 
>property on this one, and no, I didn't change it, but yes, it is now 
>ODbL clean" is, in my eyes, a legal impossibility.

I think you are probably right, but not everyone agrees.  And some of those
who don't agree will be tagging odbl=clean in accordance with their belief of
how the law works.  Can odbl=clean then be a reliable guide to what can be
distributed under the ODbL licence?

-- 
Ed Avis <eda at waniasset.com>