[Talk-GB] England Cycling Data project: DfT cycling data now available for merging

[Gregory]

I think it would be nice if OpenCycleMap could render link routes with
slightly less prominence.
Things can get confusing in city centres with lots of 'feeder' routes, so I
tend to minimise how much I actually add to the route relation.Though I
will now start adding them in as new relations with brackets.

Route changes in city centres can also confuse surveying, I'd love to have
a historical time-lapse map of the NCN through Durham, as I've discovered
some signs/stickers that I think were forgotten when new roads were built
and the route could go a better way.

On 20 June 2012 15:32, Andy Allan <gravitystorm at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 20 June 2012 15:21, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) <graham at dalmuti.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > David Earl wrote
> >>
> >> I don't know about elsewhere in the country, but in Cambridgeshire the
> >> council has used the parenthesis convention on such signs
>
> > I guess that ways signed as leading to an NCN could still use
> ncn_ref=(xx),
> > but we'd probably want to carefully note this approach somewhere on the
> wiki
> > (probably http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes )
>
> For the "link routes" as they are known within Sustrans, they should
> indeed have brackets around the ref on the signpost. They can go into
> OSM as route relations in themselves, e.g.
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1920622
>
> Cheers,
> Andy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>



-- 
Gregory
osm at livingwithdragons.com
http://www.livingwithdragons.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20120621/9819a19e/attachment.html>