[Talk-GB] Remapping update
Robert Norris
rw_norris at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 20 02:12:25 GMT 2012
> Michael Collinson wrote:
> > On 19/03/2012 13:40, John Sturdy wrote:
> > > I think the time's getting close enough that I'll resume that work
> > > anyway.
> > This is almost certainly a person I had an amicable phone
> > conversation with a week last Monday who is still concerned
> > that OS open data somehow is not compatible with the
> > new terms. Probability is dropping like a stone given the time
> > that has passed but there is still a chance of a yes.
>
> AIUI only a small amount of Andy Street's work (I don't see the point of
> pussyfooting around, we all know who it is!) is OS-derived. And, with the
> best will in the world, any monkey like thee or me can trace from OS
> OpenData, but Andy's footpath surveying work is excellent and it would be a
> shame to lose it because of an unrelated issue.
>
> Would a sensible solution be for LWG and/or any other volunteers to work
> with him on identifying the affected changesets; for those changesets to be
> retained; and for the remainder to remain 'declined' and be dropped in early
> April?
Here's my manual check (taking me about 2 hours) of Andy Streets changes.
Everything before 01/04/2010 has been assumed ok, which is around 1100 changesets.
Everything after this change has been considered:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4281583
This is about 900 changesets.
I've grouped these into a few different categories for which could be considered to have OS 'issues' - amounting to around 37 changesets:
// OS Derived changesets
// Changesets with OS named in changeset comment:
// OS StreetView
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4415489
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4415876
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4416305
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4595934
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4595929
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4595853
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7312608
// OS Locator
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7303315
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7367792
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7362036
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7321053
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7512624
// OS OpenData Locator+Streetview
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7286972
// SDNP (South Downs National Park) Import
// OS_OpenData_Strategi (except western edge)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8216155
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8216120
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8216047
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215988
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215902
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215608
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215522
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215395
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8215211
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8216603
//
// Named in source:name tag
//
// OS StreetView
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/8323516
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7550902
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7499950
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7460982
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7314486
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6780651
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5844267
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5306397
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5251524
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4537078
// OS Locator
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7436665
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/7362367
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/5353674
/// End
I'm not sure which one's he's concerned about (I have now asked him explicitly too).
I don't see any Code-Point data used, so there should be no worry there.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20120320/e2e24aaf/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list