[Talk-GB] Rights of way - Image vote

[Rob Nickerson]

Thanks for commenting/voting on which images provided enough evidence to
tag a way as a "public footpath" / "public bridleway". I am pleased to see
that there was agreement on the simple cases. Others were not so clear cut
and I chuckled when I saw that a "Undecided" option had been added to the
voting options. :-)

Next Steps:

 * It has previously been suggested that a "suspected=*" tag be used for
when a mapper is undecided. Unless there are objections, I will add
"suspected=*" (where * is one of the 4 options - public
footpath/bridleway/BOAT/RB) and a generic "suspected=row" to the wiki
guidelines. This may help us to help councils find lost way before the 2026
deadline.

* 2 more images! - I am interested in how far the suspected tag should go.
Please see the 2 additional images (taken from the wiki) added at the
bottom of the link and vote/comment as you see appropriate:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyD_Bezo5FXw27ei0eHTj1CH6Pzfbk-fz4yBd5zc7h0/edit


Cheers,
Rob

---

>Hi All
>
>Thanks for all the feedback on the UK tagging guidelines page. I have
>collated all these together and will start to implement changes to the page
>before reporting back here.
>
>I would like to add a few more images to help new users identify public
>rights of way. Can you please spend a couple of minutes to vote on whether
>the following images provide enough evidence to support a
>designation=public_footpath / public_bridleway tag:
>>https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyD_Bezo5FXw27ei0eHTj1CH6Pzfbk-fz4yBd5zc7h0/edit <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyD_Bezo5FXw27ei0eHTj1CH6Pzfbk-fz4yBd5zc7h0/edit>
>
>Thanks,
>RobJN
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20120510/11eae52f/attachment.html>