[Talk-GB] Rights of way - Image vote

[SomeoneElse]

Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
> If the right of way is recorded in the Definitive Statement, then its 
> 100% verifiable that it is indeed a right of way, and we can (given 
> permission to use the Statement) record that in OSM.

Indeed - but it's helpful if a "source:designation" indicates that, so 
that people know that there isn't a sign on the ground, but the source 
is legitimate.

There are occasional misunderstandings where newbies think 
"designation=public_footpath" is how all footpaths are tagged regardless 
of legal status, and sometimes things turn up without any obvious 
verifiability (I'm thinking particularly of the recent issue with byways 
in England, and also C roads).

Cheers,
Andy