[Talk-GB] Request: Norfolk Broads National Park Boundary

[Robert Norris]

I've downloaded the some of the data sets and fired up qgis.

So, yes the Natural England datasets are a better resolution for National Parks.


Be Seeing You - Rob.
If at first you don't succeed,
then skydiving isn't for you.


----------------------------------------
> From: ed at loach.me.uk
> To: rw_norris at hotmail.com; talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
> Subject: RE: [Talk-GB] Request: Norfolk Broads National Park Boundary
> Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 07:50:33 +0000
>
> I've not looked at OS Strategi, but the Natural England datasets are
> now OGL licenced and they contain the national park boundaries, and
> I think are better resolution.
>
> http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/publications/data/default.aspx
>
> Ed
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Norris [mailto:rw_norris at hotmail.com]
> > Sent: 02 November 2012 23:50
> > To: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: [Talk-GB] Request: Norfolk Broads National Park Boundary
> >
> >
> >
> > I believe that currently a boundary way or relation for the
> National
> > Park of the Norfolk Broads is missing from OSM.
> >
> > I was wondering if any one in the East Anglia area would be up to
> the
> > challenge of creating it?
> >
> > I assume the best way of creating a tentative out-line would be a
> > manual conversion or trace from the OS Strategi product, similar
> to
> > how the South Downs National Park area was mapped.
> >
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_
> > National_Parks
> >
> > Sounds ideal for something to do on these long winter nights...
> >
> > Be Seeing You - Rob.
> > If at first you don't succeed,
> > then skydiving isn't for you.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>