[Talk-GB] Named street shown as missing on ITO OSM analysis

[Donald Noble]

Thanks - It should indeed be name = Columbia Terrace

I knew I had done something stupid, but couldn't see it for looking!

It is only really a parking area, hence why I tagged it as service rather
than residential


On 29 March 2013 11:29, Philip Barnes <phil at trigpoint.me.uk> wrote:

> Should it be name = Columbia Terrace. The service tag is used for the type
> of service road, i.e. driveway.
>
>
> Am wondering if highway = residential, motor_vehicle = private would be
> better?
>
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> Sent from my Nokia N9
>
>
>
> On 29/03/2013 10:36 Donald Noble wrote:
> Hullo all,
>
> Wondering if anyone can shed any light on this. I added a street/name
> following a survey a couple of weeks ago, but it is still showing as
> missing on the ITO OSM analysis map.
>
> See:
> http://www.itoworld.com/product/data/osm_analysis/map_browser?bbox=276130,800720,276384,800951&referrer=area
>
> Which should be: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/210073170
>
> I think the row of houses is Columba Terrace, so I have added it to the
> addr:street and also to the service lane at the back, but neither seem to
> be being picked up.
>
> Is this just a glitch, has the ITO analysis not updated recently, or have
> I done something silly?
>
> Cheers, Donald
>
> --
> Donald Noble
> http://drnoble.co.uk - http://flickr.com/photos/drnoble
>
>


-- 
Donald Noble
http://drnoble.co.uk - http://flickr.com/photos/drnoble
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20130329/2cda22a9/attachment.html>