[Talk-GB] associatedParking relation

[sk53.osm]

Copied to list too.

An interesting idea, but I don't like the idea of namespacing roles:
relations are complicated enough. At the moment the access tag should do
this.

I'd like to keep the relation simple for now so am very much looking for a
convenient catch-all name for the business to which the parking relates
(actually "business" may do perfectly well!)


On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 3:41 PM, John Sturdy <jcg.sturdy at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:31 PM, sk53.osm <sk53.osm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The only thing I'm not sure about is having the role of the owning entity
>> blank. Any suggestions for a name for the role. Note that the relation
>> between parking owning entity is not necessarily m:1, it could be 1:m
>> (e.g., take-aways sharing a car park), or even m:n.
>>
>
> How about making the role indicate what use the owning entity makes of the
> parking, e.g. "customers" and "staff" (or perhaps "parking:customers" and
> "parking:staff")?  This could be useful when the owning entity owns several
> distinct types of parking.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20130513/e135c0fb/attachment-0001.html>