[Talk-GB] Advice needed for maxweight turning restriction

Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Sat Oct 12 20:00:38 UTC 2013


I came across an odd situation where a road is on way, except for cycles
and vehicles over 13'3" high. Its a residential area of Shrewsbury which
would be a useful rat run, hence the oneway. But to make it complicated,
there is are industrial units, and a low bridge.

Not sure of a better way, but have added a note.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39348226

Phil (trigpoint) 



On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 20:11 +0100, Ed Loach wrote:
> ael wrote:
> 
> > I have a road with a maxweight (7.5t) sign at one end but none at
> the
> > other end. So I take it that this means that vehicles over this
> weight
> > may not enter from that end.
> > 
> > I have used relation tagged with
> > type=restriction:maxweight
> > maxweight = 7.5
> > restriction = no_entry
> > 
> > including the relevant ways with "from" and "to" roles.
> > 
> > This was my best guess from what I could find on the wiki.
> > 
> > Is this the right way (in the UK)? Or will it be interpreted as
> no-entry
> > for all vehicles by routers?
> 
> I mapped a road which had different maxweight restrictions depending
> on which way you entered it:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/55165330
> I used maxweight:forward and maxweight:backward based if I remember
> correctly on IRC discussion and this wiki page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forward_%26_backward,_left_%26_ri
> ght
> 
> No relations needed. In your case you would only need to tag either
> forward or backward depending on the way direction.
> 
> Whether routers spot these tags currently or not I don't know; I
> personally doubt it. But they may in the future if they don't
> already.
> 
> I hope this helps,
> 
> Ed
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb






More information about the Talk-GB mailing list