[Talk-GB] Marks & Sparks...

[Will Phillips]

On 09/08/2014 11:16, Richard Symonds wrote:
> Perhaps "should not be tolerated" is a bit strongly worded. "Should be 
> prevented"?

Yes, I accept that was a little too strong.

In this case, an earlier version of the edit had already been reverted 
by a member of the Data Working Group, and I was a little frustrated to 
see it had been put back without addressing the issues raised the first 
time.

Will
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20140809/0237ff11/attachment.html>