[Talk-GB] UK Open Government Licence
SK53
sk53.osm at gmail.com
Sat Jan 25 20:10:01 UTC 2014
Dan thanks for making this clear: it is the OSGB OGL one I was referring to.
On 25 January 2014 19:40, Dan S <danstowell+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-01-25 SK53 <sk53.osm at gmail.com>:
> > Agree, we also have both OGL 1.0 (e.g., Natural England) and OGL 2.0
> (e.g,
> > OSGB).
> >
> > I've been reading the licenses again, and I think the main sticking
> point is
> > the viral attribution clause.
> > [...snip...]
>
> I don't want to divert from Jerry's main points, but I just want to
> make sure no-one misreads his reply the same way I just did. The OGL
> does not have any viral attribution clause - which happens to be the
> point I was making in my reply to Matthijs earlier today! It's the
> Ordnance Survey's version of OGL which has a viral attribution clause.
> I agree with Jerry's analysis, but I note that there's no _viral_
> attribution when using data that is under the standard OGL (and is
> uncontaminated by any second-hand OSGB content).
>
> Best
> Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20140125/1df0c6b2/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list