[Talk-GB] Suburbs in London/Brum - big edits
richard.mann.westoxford at gmail.com
Wed Nov 19 10:24:57 UTC 2014
I'd revert the changes.
The rule I worked to a couple of years ago, when I tried to iron out some
of the inconsistencies in London was to use place=town for places with a
sizeable retail centre (typically lots of clothes shops as well as food).
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Tom Chance <tom at acrewoods.net> wrote:
> Hello there,
> As somebody who dislikes change, I was slightly horrified to see these
> The user has changed a whole lot of places within London and Birmingham
> that were tagged as town / village / hamlet / etc. to place=suburb. He
> appears to be following the advice now given on the wiki, that:
> "Areas of a town/city should not be tagged with place=town, place=village
> or place=hamlet. These should only be used for distinct settlements."
> Apart from the fact that I cannot stand it when the work of self-appointed
> wiki editors leads to somebody making sweeping edits of others' work, I
> also really don't like losing the hierarchy of place implicit in Wimbledon
> being marked as a town, Forest Hill a village, Belleden a hamlet, and so
> on, and them all just becoming 'suburb'. Apart from the fact that many
> places in London were historically towns in their own right, they are often
> also regarded as town centres.
> But should we swallow this and move to the use of
> If so, I'd like to do this properly, instead of the process that this user
> has gone through to just make everything 'suburb'.
> http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-GB