[Talk-GB] Suburbs in London/Brum - big edits
info at matthijsmelissen.nl
Thu Nov 20 19:29:46 UTC 2014
On 20 November 2014 08:51, Andy Robinson <ajrlists at gmail.com> wrote:
> It’s not likely to be as simple as saying everywhere within a city boundary
> is a suburb. A simple example is the town of Sutton Coldfield which recently
> regained it Royal Town status, Its officially a town in every traditional
> sense yet it is part of Birmingham though devolution of powers back to the
> town from Birmingham is slowly (very slowly) happening with time. There is
> no gap in the conurbation between what is known as Sutton Coldfield and the
> rest of Birmingham. It’s not considered a suburb of Birmingham as it’s a
> town destination in its own right and locals who hail from it would always
> say they were from the town and not the city of Birmingham.
Why don't we follow post towns?
In the Birmingham area, that would give us cities/town/villages
Birmingham, Alcester, Bromsgrove, Halesowen, Cradley Heath, Rowley
Regis, Smethwick, Oldbury, West Bromwich, Sutton Coldfield, Tamworth,
Studyley, Solihull, Henley-in-Arden, and Redditch.
Places like Moseley, Kings Heath, and Bournbrook would become suburbs,
which is quite reasonable in my opinion - these places are clearly
part of the settlement Birmingham.
In most other countries, deciding between village and suburb is a bit
easier because villages have their own town sign (usually functioning
as built-up area sign as well), while suburbs have no such sign. Post
towns in such countries, at least in the Netherlands, are usually
equivalent to signed towns.
More information about the Talk-GB