[Talk-GB] Paths and Footways

Matthijs Melissen info at matthijsmelissen.nl
Tue Aug 18 08:48:49 UTC 2015

On 18 August 2015 at 10:20, Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/08/2015 07:43, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> On 18 Aug 2015 03:56, "Andy Townsend" <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There's no interest to do this in the OSM "standard" style because it is
>> abundantly clear that any new attempts at changes that make rural navigation
>> possible* in OSM-carto would be rejected based on the ones that already have
>> been over the last year.
> This is not true, a different rendering based on hiking routes or public
> rights of way is something we could certainly consider.
> As I said previously, changes such as this aren't really relevant "if you
> can't see the paths themselves at all at a zoom level you'd use for planning
> a route over them.".
> However, now you're saying "... a different rendering ...".

I meant that we could consider changing the current Default rendering.

> In the
> immediately previous message you said:
> "So far there is little interest to do this on the OSM default render style
> which seems odd to me given how much fuss there has been on this list to
> recent changes to the footway/path style (over the last year)!"

I didn't write that (or anything you address in the rest of your
message) - I am not Rob Nickerson.

-- Matthijs

More information about the Talk-GB mailing list