[Talk-GB] import / mech edit of some Aberdeen city council open data
danstowell+osm at gmail.com
Sat Feb 7 21:31:02 UTC 2015
How do you know it's OGL licensed? I went to try and find the licence
and I found this page:
where the licence is stated to be CC-BY-SA-3, which cannot be imported
into OSM (because the SA constraint means it can't be relicensed as
ODBL). I can't be certain that I found the "same" schools data (...in
fact it has 72 vs 70 items in it...), but I guess at some point the
imports-list would demand proper proof that it's available under a
compatible licence. They'd also ask how the lat/lon were found (did it
involve OS? google?), since that's been an issue with some imports.
>From my point of view, this is a simple and small dataset and I
personally would not object to an import as long as duplicates were
avoided etc. Others probably feel different. It's mainly the licence
question for me. Oh and I don't live anywhere near Aberdeen ;)
2015-02-07 17:24 GMT+00:00 Jo Walsh <metazool at fastmail.net>:
> I'm here at http://codethecity.org and neiljp has just arrived, too, and
> we are egging one another on to import some Aberdeen city council open
> data into OSM.
> Specifically looking at this dataset of schools with point locations:
> An overpass query reveals a mix of node and way data for schools
> existing, with nothing like the same coverage.
> Would people be broadly okay with this / should we be following a
> process through the list?
> The data is OGL licensed.
> Jo Walsh
> metazool at fastmail.net
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-GB