[Talk-GB] Thrapston viaduct

[Andy Townsend]

On 14/07/2015 20:24, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> The only significant difference seems to be that the latter is tagged:
>
>     railway=disused
>
> rather than "abandoned". In actual fact, "unused" would be more
> appropriate, as it was never used.
>

It looks like it was recently changed from "abandoned" to "disused".  
Call me a cynic, but I wonder if that was someone simply "tagging for 
the renderer"?  If there are no in-situ rails, it's not "disused".

Cheers,

Andy.