[Talk-GB] Thrapston viaduct

Andy Townsend ajt1047 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 20:30:31 UTC 2015

On 14/07/2015 20:24, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> The only significant difference seems to be that the latter is tagged:
>     railway=disused
> rather than "abandoned". In actual fact, "unused" would be more
> appropriate, as it was never used.

It looks like it was recently changed from "abandoned" to "disused".  
Call me a cynic, but I wonder if that was someone simply "tagging for 
the renderer"?  If there are no in-situ rails, it's not "disused".



More information about the Talk-GB mailing list