[Talk-GB] Thrapston viaduct
ajt1047 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 14 20:30:31 UTC 2015
On 14/07/2015 20:24, Andy Mabbett wrote:
> The only significant difference seems to be that the latter is tagged:
> rather than "abandoned". In actual fact, "unused" would be more
> appropriate, as it was never used.
It looks like it was recently changed from "abandoned" to "disused".
Call me a cynic, but I wonder if that was someone simply "tagging for
the renderer"? If there are no in-situ rails, it's not "disused".
More information about the Talk-GB