[Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

[Nick Whitelegg]

Hello Dudley,


Not sure if it's standard but I use either "designation=orpa" if there's explicit evidence of it being one, or "suspected=orpa" if there isn't (e.g. a 'green lane' which is unsignposted but has evidence of regular foot/horse use).


Nick


________________________________
From: Dudley Ibbett <dudleyibbett at hotmail.com>
Sent: 13 February 2016 14:57
To: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access

Hi

I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign posted in both directions as a "Public Road" It makes a loop between two "unclassified" roads.
Functionally, is seems to be a service route for an isolated farm that sits at the top of the loop, although it would make quite an useful link road between the two "unclassified" roads .  I crossed it at the top of the loop so I don't know what there was with regards to signs at each end.  On the OS 1:25 it is marked as "Other Routes With Public Access".  Is there anything I can infer from the use of the term "Public Road".  i.e foot, horse, bicycle, vehicle = yes/no? How are people tagging the "designation" of such routes,  i.e. are people using  "designation=other routes with public access"?

Many Thanks

Dudley
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20160213/66b15300/attachment.html>