[Talk-GB] Open data (Was: Parliamentary debate mentions OSM)

Dave F davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Tue Mar 29 11:57:44 UTC 2016

I'm currently perusing the datasets of Bath & North East Somerset that's 
been distributed via Bath: Hacked. 
https://github.com/BathHacked/banes-geographic-data (I'll be posting a 
separate thread to clarifying a couple of points about it soon).

These sets certainly contain useful information, but I don't think they 
should be imported directly . Although most are much more complete than 
the equivalent data in OSM, many aren't as accurate. I certainly won't 
be importing footpaths which often veer through hedges & buildings. What 
does appear useful is the meta-data. Each rubbish bins has an ID number. 
Who knew?

I'll be using a combination of Leaflet/Umap to do a contract & compare 
of the datasets & Potlatch's excellent 'Tasks' utility to add 
information, but only after verifying it with a ground survey. I think 
I'm going to be busy.

Dave F.

On 29/03/2016 09:42, Andy Allan wrote:
> On 26 March 2016 at 06:30, Rob Nickerson <rob.j.nickerson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> How do we ensure the mix continues to contain a lot of OSM data?
> At the highest level, by making sure the focus of OpenStreetMap is
> on-the-ground mapping, which best enables us to capture valuable
> information that's not available in other datasources.
> Thanks,
> Andy
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

More information about the Talk-GB mailing list