[Talk-GB] Building that have been replaced
Dave F
davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Fri Aug 4 11:04:26 UTC 2017
I'm pretty sure we've had this conversion before, where I pointed out
OSM is not a historical record. If gone in the real world,it should be
removed from OSM. If you wish to store out date info, transfer it to
Open History Map.
Seeing OSM is a global endeavour it's disappointing you keep repeat
'Around here...' as if Nottingham is somehow different & special when
compare with elsewhere.
On 04/08/2017 09:20, SK53 wrote:
> Around here (Nottingham) we generally put something like demolished:
> building=* on the old way. Particular ly useful if you have several
> active mappers not all knowing about recent demolitions.
>
> On 4 Aug 2017 07:19, "David Fox" <davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
> <mailto:davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com>> wrote:
>
> Add the new building. We should map what is currently on the
> ground. Please don't be slave to out of date data or fear of edits
> being reversed.
>
> On 4 August 2017, at 06:42, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> How different is the footprint of the new building?
>
> I would think that the new building will be of a similar size to
> the old one - given the planing permissions.
>
> So unless you intend to put in the new building .. I would leave
> it alone - that gives at least an indication that there is a
> building there.
>
> Add a note to say it has been replaced with something similar?
>
>
> On 04-Aug-17 09:37 AM, Dan S wrote:
> > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:demolished>:
> >
> > (your note is not likely to be noticed by someone who is in the
> middle
> > of editing, I suggest)
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-08-03 16:39 GMT+01:00 Andrew Black
> <andrewdblack at googlemail.com <mailto:andrewdblack at googlemail.com>>:
> >> What should one do if there are building that have been knocked
> down and
> >> rebuilt.
> >> Loathe just to delete them because an armchair mapper will come
> back and add
> >> them back. The new building is not in current bing imagary.
> >> I have added a note #1077006
> >>
> >> I am loathe to take photos or roam with a GPS in a hospital
> grounds!
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Talk-GB mailing list
> >> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org>
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org>
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20170804/bb1d5341/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list