[Talk-GB] Footpath Open Data is not always accurate.

[Dave F]

On 05/02/2017 11:33, Colin Smale wrote:
>
> Any paths that no longer follow the official route (as per the DM/DS) 
> should not be tagged as PROW and probably as access=permissive unless 
> they go across otherwise public land. The official route is still a 
> public right of way, it's just no longer usable as such.
>

We should be mapping what's on the ground, as PROW signs & stiles 
indicate, even if that doesn't correspond with the definitive map. They 
should be tagged to correspond with the signs status.

DaveF


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20170206/bc9b3aa8/attachment.html>