[Talk-GB] Prow_ref format

Dave F davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Sat Nov 4 17:49:30 UTC 2017


I've started adding Prow_ref=* to the paths within my Local Authority. 
I've been using the format as decided by them.

I noticed another mapper has already added a few, but using the format 
by Barry Cornelius at rowmaps.com. I think this shouldn't be used as 
it's Barry's own concoction.

As the LA is the organisation someone would most likely converse with 
about PROWs, it seemed sensible to use the format issued by them. It 
makes verification of any updates *much* easier.

To check I looked at the wiki: 

I wasn't really surprised to find another format recommended. A couple 
things appear wrong with this:
* including the parish name in any format other than as issued by the LA 
will lead to confusion if their boundaries are amended
* path abbreviations are unnecessary as their classifications are 
already defined in other OSM tags (highway & designation)

Having a 'standard' within OSM seems counter productive as it would make 
it non-standard with the vast majority of LAs.

Your thoughts?


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

More information about the Talk-GB mailing list