[Talk-GB] boundary mania
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Sun Aug 26 19:17:25 UTC 2018
On 26/08/18 20:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I think we should all think twice before duplicating and triplicating
> data in OSM just because there's yet another boundary that includes
> Hampshire. We should find a way to reference existing boundaries instead
> of copying them.
It looks to me as though boundaries can be defined recursively, so
Hampshire, rather than its bounding ways, ought to to be the object
referenced in the bigger entities.
On the original question, I would say that the thin end of the wedge is
going in and needs to be stopped.
More information about the Talk-GB