[Talk-GB] Mapping horse steps?
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue Aug 28 00:32:54 UTC 2018
On 27/08/18 23:28, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 27/08/18 13:32, Edward Catmur wrote:
>> amenity=horse_dismount_block has 4 occurrences, all in the north of
>> England.
>
> I think I'm responsible for half of those - happy to pick a different
> tag if someone's got a better idea!
>
> There are actually a selection of tags used for this sort of thing:
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -- Horse mounting blocks
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> if (( keyvalues["amenity"] == "mounting_block" ) or
> ( keyvalues["bridleway"] == "mounting_block" ) or
> ( keyvalues["historic"] == "mounting_block" ) or
> ( keyvalues["horse"] == "mounting_block" ) or
> ( keyvalues["horse"] == "mounting block" ) or
> ( keyvalues["amenity"] == "mounting_step" ) or
> ( keyvalues["amenity"] == "mounting_steps" ) or
> ( keyvalues["amenity"] == "horse_dismount_block" )) then
> keyvalues["man_made"] = "mounting_block"
> end
>
> https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L2211
>
>
> all very low usage.
horse=* is used as an access thing .. so I'd not encourage its use for
other things.
e.g. there exists horse=dismount .. I think that means the rider must
get off the horse to proceed .. an access condition, not a facility to
assist dismounting.
I'll raise it on the tagging list and see what they come up with.
My personal preference at the moment is for man_made=mounting_steps. But
that is just me.
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list