[Talk-GB] FHRS info when pub has been taken over.
Gregrs
gregrs at fastmail.co.uk
Sun Jan 21 10:38:00 UTC 2018
Hi all,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 12:36:34AM +0000, Dave F wrote:
>I've been prefixing them with disused: as the fhrs:id will be probably
>be updated after a new review. I found keeping the old one was useful
>as a checking reference.
Prefixing with disused, old or not could be useful. (I haven't checked
which is in more frequent use.) EdLoach added an issue for the FHRS/OSM
comparison tool that suggests the use of not:fhrs:id. Whilst the
functionality he describes isn't currently supported by the tool, I will
try to get round to adding it at some point: see
https://github.com/gregrs-uk/python-fhrs-osm/issues/50
>I've also compiled a list of disused: objects to send to my LA's
>hygiene team in an attempt to get them to update their database. Not
>much luck with that.
If you're on Twitter, it might be worth tweeting @drsiant (Head of
Information Management at FSA) as she seems keen for this sort of
exchange of information.
I would also agree with Colin that you should definitely leave the
address data in place. Also the source:addr=FHRS Open Data should be
left in place if present and probably added if not present.
Thanks,
Greg
--
Twitter: @gregrs_uk
http://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org
PGP key ID: 64907C8A
Fingerprint: EBD1 077F CCDD 841E A505 3FAA D2E8 592E 6490 7C8A
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 516 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20180121/8fed6b41/attachment.sig>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list