[Talk-GB] Possible removal of FHRS tags

[SK53]

I see little value for all of these except fhrs:rating_date which is
scarcely used. The local authority to which a rating belongs can be
directly determined from OSM most of the time, but may be useful in
Northern Ireland where we have no good usable data on LA boundaries.

I would rather that if they are to be removed it is when data is updated
(i.e. by the editor discard list).

I do have a collection of extracts of FHRS data going back to 2013, but
have not been updating these regularly for some time. They are useful for
providing address details & sometimes as a cross check that a place has
genuinely gone out of business (e.g., a note to the effect that a pub has
closed).

Jerry

On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 15:19, Andrew Hain <andrewhainosm at hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:

> Are the keys fhrs:rating (3358 occurences in Taginfo), fhrs:inspectiondate
> (1748), fhrs:confidence_management, fhrs:hygiene, fhrs:structural (621
> each) and fhrs:rating_date (22) better off removed from our database, or
> should they be kept for businesses that disappear from FHRS listings when
> still open?
>
> What about fhrs:local_authority_id (11724)?
>
> Is fhrs:authority (12981) useful for businesses on borders? [
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/807942]
>
> Should any that are not kept be removed in bulk or added th discarded
> lists in editors?
>
> --
> Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190814/2be82f87/attachment.html>