[Talk-GB] Possible removal of FHRS tags

[talk-gb at manet-computer.co.uk]

There were a few mechanical edits removing tags about 7 or 8 months ago that
caused some discussion and reverts
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65131453



Personally I tend to enter the following when adding FHRS data in addition
to any name and address fields that are missing:

・         FHRSID →  <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:id>
fhrs:id=*

・         LocalAuthorityBusinessID →
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:local_authority_id>
fhrs:local_authority_id=*

・         LocalAuthorityName →
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fhrs:authority> fhrs:authority=*



Regards



Richard



From: Andrew Hain [mailto:andrewhainosm at hotmail.co.uk]
Sent: 14 August 2019 15:18
To: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Possible removal of FHRS tags



Are the keys fhrs:rating (3358 occurences in Taginfo), fhrs:inspectiondate
(1748), fhrs:confidence_management, fhrs:hygiene, fhrs:structural (621 each)
and fhrs:rating_date (22) better off removed from our database, or should
they be kept for businesses that disappear from FHRS listings when still
open?



What about fhrs:local_authority_id (11724)?



Is fhrs:authority (12981) useful for businesses on borders?
[https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/807942]



Should any that are not kept be removed in bulk or added th discarded lists
in editors?



--

Andrew





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190814/a1c53609/attachment-0001.html>