[Talk-GB] Disused or empty apartments

[Mike Baggaley]

Perhaps setting both building=yes and disused: building=apartments would fulfill all the needs.

Regards,
Mike

On 18 Dec 2019, 12:00, at 12:00, talk-gb-request at openstreetmap.org wrote:
>Send Talk-GB mailing list submissions to
>	talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	talk-gb-request at openstreetmap.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	talk-gb-owner at openstreetmap.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Talk-GB digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Disused or empty apartments prior to demolition
>      (David Woolley)
>   2. Re: Disused or empty apartments prior to demolition
>      (Robert Skedgell)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 20:54:24 +0000
>From: David Woolley <forums at david-woolley.me.uk>
>To: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Disused or empty apartments prior to demolition
>Message-ID: <14f1fd0d-149b-e3dd-40e4-a1da4c995948 at david-woolley.me.uk>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>On 17/12/2019 20:35, Warin wrote:
>> 
>> so
>> building=apartments
>> becomes
>> disused:building=apartments
>> 
>> or
>> building=yes
>> becomes
>> disused:building=yes
>
>I disagree.  It is still a building.  In fact some of the most 
>interesting buildings are disused ones.
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 08:20:27 +0000
>From: Robert Skedgell <rob at hubris.org.uk>
>To: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Disused or empty apartments prior to demolition
>Message-ID: <8277e623-b349-1534-08a3-9a085012ed3c at hubris.org.uk>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>On 17/12/2019 20:54, David Woolley wrote:
>> On 17/12/2019 20:35, Warin wrote:
>>>
>>> so
>>> building=apartments
>>> becomes
>>> disused:building=apartments
>>>
>>> or
>>> building=yes
>>> becomes
>>> disused:building=yes
>> 
>> I disagree.  It is still a building.  In fact some of the most 
>> interesting buildings are disused ones.
>
>Rather than change the tagging on the buildings, if they are currently 
>enclosed by a landuse=residential polygon*, perhaps change that to 
>something else (splitting the polygon if appropriate)?
>
>Unfortunately that creates another headache, as neither 
>landuse=construction nor landuse=brownfield really seem to fit the 
>original case.
>
>* In the OP's example, this is
>https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676088956
>
>-- 
>Robert Skedgell (rskedgell)
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Subject: Digest Footer
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-GB mailing list
>Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>End of Talk-GB Digest, Vol 159, Issue 14
>****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20191218/b4a65cef/attachment.html>