[Talk-GB] DoBIH Update - Permission Received

[Silent Spike]

Yes I think we could establish which entries are suitable for use (i.e.
those with an entry in the "survey" field of the database) and note this
guideline on the wiki under third party data here
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom#Third_party_data>.
Perhaps introduce a standard of tagging "source=DoBIH" where the data has
been used.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:29 AM Steven Horner <steven at stevenhorner.com>
wrote:

> I would think it would be the actual surveyed heights and exact locations
> that would be the most use for OSM. Could we not use only the ones that
> have been surveyed in the DoBH data, then this could not be claimed to be
> Ordnance Surveys data.
>
> Regards,
> Steven
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 12:14 AM Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 23/02/2019 23:04, Adam Snape wrote:
>> >
>> > Most of the heights should be derivable from OS Open Data mapping layers
>>
>> ... or from out of copyright OS data.  Hills don't change their height
>> much over a human timescale.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190225/5b1879d6/attachment.html>