[Talk-GB] OS National Grid References

Brian Prangle bprangle at gmail.com
Thu Jan 24 12:56:52 UTC 2019

Thanks for your knowledgeable replies which reassure me that grid refs are
not copyright, but the 1995 court case is still perplexing. My source was a
news item from the Guardian and I can't find any accessible online source
which has the legal argument and details of the case. Does anyone know any
more about this case? Perhaps I should ask OS.



On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 23:53, SK53 <sk53.osm at gmail.com> wrote:

> As virtually every biological recording scheme has used National Grid
> references extensively since the early 1960s , and OSGB have not (yet) sued
> me for my user name, I think you can take that this is pretty much a dead
> letter.
> I can also cite Constable walking guides from the 1970s.
> Any attempt by OSGB to enforce copyright would undoubtedly be
> self-defeating, so I cant see them doing it.
> Jerry
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 16:21, Brian Prangle <bprangle at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Are these covered by copyright? I've found conflicting opinions:
>> out of copyright in 1986 - since it was 50 years since the introduction
>> of the NG in 1936
>> and
>> "current case law supports this ownership, given in Ordnance Survey vs
>> Younger and others (Ch 10 April 1995), in which Sir Jeremy Vinelott,
>> sitting as a Judge of the High Court, ruled that "OS copyright material
>> includes the National Grid" and that "the OS retain the right to refuse to
>> allow ... [someone] ... to use the National Grid", a right taken up in that
>> case. "
>> Can anyone shed any light on this?
>> regards
>> Brian
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190124/57b2b75d/attachment.html>

More information about the Talk-GB mailing list