[Talk-GB] Ground truth v legal truth

David Woolley forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Fri Jul 19 13:17:50 UTC 2019

On 19/07/2019 13:37, Tom Hughes wrote:
>> I would say the logical consequence of that argument is that no road 
>> should be mapped as tertiary, as, unless taken from OS, it is a 
>> subjective judgement and can't be consistently verified.
> That doesn't follow - in the UK we have always (with very rare
> exceptions like Oxford High Street) mapped secondary, primary and
> trunk to the official status of the road.

You seem to be rejecting the original proposal.  I was analysing the 
case where the original proposal is accepted, and therefore the official 
status must be ignored if it is not signposted.

More information about the Talk-GB mailing list