[Talk-GB] Ground truth v legal truth

Philip Barnes phil at trigpoint.me.uk
Fri Jul 19 17:49:51 UTC 2019


On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 07:06 -0700, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Tom Hughes wrote:
> > That doesn't follow - in the UK we have always (with very rare
> > exceptions like Oxford High Street) mapped secondary, primary 
> > and trunk to the official status of the road.
> 
> It's slightly more nuanced than that - we have always mapped
> secondary,
> primary and trunk to the _observable_ official status of the road.
> 
> Where a road isn't signposted with that status, we don't have a
> strong
> precedent. There is at least one such road which has been
> highway=tertiary
> since 2009. It is not signposted as the A*** on the ground - indeed,
> traffic
> for the A*** is expressly signed another way - but legally it is the
> A***.
> And no I'm not going to say where it is or some Sabristo[1] will come
> along
> and "fix" it.
> 
> Philip's example is the same: I know the road he's talking about and
> it
> isn't signposted as the A****, it's signposted only for the little
> suburb
> along it. There is a very definite decision there on the part of the
> highways authority to not treat it as an A road.
> 
> I don't have a simple answer, but I am tempted by the logic that
> where the
> highways authority has clearly made a decision not to signpost a road
> as (in
> OSM terms) secondary, primary or trunk, we should follow suit and tag
> something like highway=tertiary, designation=primary, ref=A***.
> 
Thank you for your comments Richard.

Using a designation tag in these cases would make a lot of sense. 

We should certainly not be undermining hard pressed local authorities
who are doing their best to improve the quality of life of their
residents.

Phil (trigpoint)




More information about the Talk-GB mailing list