[Talk-GB] road relations

[Dave F]

Hi

I've yet to hear a valid reasoning for this relation type. It's much 
more beneficial to add addresses instead.

There appears an increasing tendency to collect almost anything together 
into a relation. See public-transport's 'stop_area' as another example 
This is not why relations were conceived. It just adds duplication, 
confusion & errors.

Personally I would delete associatedStreet.

DaveF

On 01/06/2019 11:10, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Has anyone else come across relations grouping road assets? i.e. the road
> itself plus shops, buildings, street objects? e.g.
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1866997 Has this format become
> accepted elsewhere in the world or is it experimental?
>
> Regards,
>                Jez
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190601/9b73e261/attachment.html>