[Talk-GB] road relations

[Colin Smale]

On 2019-06-01 13:32, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:

> You're talking about a different subject, which 'associatedstreets' won't resolve.

Are you sure? Maybe you would restate concisely the problem as you see
it. The relation linked to in Jez' original post was
type=associatedStreet and he actually referred to a broader range of
objects, many of which don't have addresses as such. Why should an
explicit link between a building (or any other object) and the street it
is associated with be a bad thing, if computational geometry may lead to
an incorrect result? I would not like to think that the accuracy of the
location of these objects should be compromised so it yields the
"expected" results for a given set of circumstances. 

C.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190601/b0970104/attachment.html>