[Talk-GB] Adjacent nature reserves

[Rob Nickerson]

Hi Martin,

I echo Gareth, Mateusz and Warin's view that this should have stayed mapped
as separate nature reserves. The previous areas would have (hopefully)
marked the legal boundary of the individual nature reserves - something
which we have now lost. I see for example that the area you have now marked
as Burlish Top Nature Reserve is much smaller than it used to be.

Old:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71023754

New:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506211512

I'm also finding it very difficult to see what you are changing as you have
created so many changesets and they all have the same description (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Martin%20Wynne/history#map=13/52.3652/-2.2799).
Would it please be possible to create fewer changesets and/or provide more
detailed changeset comments.

You may wish to ask Andy to help with reverting this as he will have plenty
of experience from his role in the Data Working Group. The fact that it is
over many changesets makes it too challenging for me.

Best regards,
*Rob*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190607/cec23aeb/attachment.html>