[Talk-GB] TfL Cycling Infrastructure Database
Martin Lucas-Smith - CycleStreets
list-osm-talk-gb at cyclestreets.net
Fri May 10 16:26:02 UTC 2019
On Fri, 10 May 2019, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> Their data is highly accurate,
Yes, that seems to me as well to be the case. We're just awaiting more
images to be uploaded to the site (every feature has two images, but not
all are GDPR-cleared yet).
I'd welcome as many eyes as possible on the sample data to get a good
assessment of the data quality.
https://tflcid.cyclestreets.net/
> and there's definitely going to need to be some clever conflation
> tooling. Bike stands are fine, but advance stop lines, etc. are
> specialist subjects in my book. I'm sightly overawed by the quantity and
> am unsure whether volunteers are going to be able to get through it, but
> again that is something you'll be talking about in your report, no?
Yes, that will be a key issue. Bear in mind that the sample data is only
one of *25* areas, so there's a lot of data.
Clearly, pre-translations in the data to convert the CID schema to OSM
tagging would remove a lot of manual work, and a conflation tool could work
on a similar basis to the England Cycling Data project tool [1]. I think
there's scope for some pre-processing (e.g. eliminating locations in the
CID data that clearly already exist in OSM based on a nearness search), and
the ability for multiple features to be done at once, e.g. a screen where
say 10-20 cycle parking locations could be reviewed at once. Again, views
on this would be extremely welcome.
> There would need to be some tool development regardless of who does the
> conflation.
Indeed. I'd welcome pointers to up-to-date information on the state of such
tools at the moment, e.g. the JOSM tool, and other developments currently
happening.
[1] See images on:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/England_Cycling_Data_project
Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists
Developer, CycleStreets ** https://www.cyclestreets.net/
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list