[Talk-GB] Parcel Post-boxes (again): national roll-out?
Paul Berry
pmberry2007 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 29 11:14:56 UTC 2019
We could try and arrive at a consensus now or wait for one to emerge
organically by keeping an eye on trends here:
https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/osm-box-type.html
Personally I'm going to opt for post_box:type=meter;parcel for the few I've
noticed appearing in Leeds.
Regards,
*Paul*
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 18:29, jc129--- via Talk-GB <
talk-gb at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> On 28/11/2019 14:51, SK53 wrote:
> > I've never been entirely happy with post_box:type which generally
> describes
> > form also describing function as in post_box:type=meter, and this change
> > sort of highlights the problems. Should we use post_box:type=meter;parcel
> > or post_box:type=parcel or a different tag altogether.
>
> You make a good point Jerry about form/function for these specific boxes.
> I'm not sure what the right answer is.
>
> Currently they are in the process of converting ALL c.1,400 existing meter
> boxes to accept parcels, but to quote from their blog: "Following the
> launch, Royal Mail will assess the prospect of adapting and updating
> pre-existing letterboxes to the parcel postbox format."
> Source:
> https://www.royalmailgroup.com/en/insights-innovation/innovation/parcel-postboxes-accelerating-a-parcel-s-journey-from-website-purchase-to-doorstep-delivery/
> How this would happen is anyone's guess!
>
> Jez C
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20191129/b8b2bbd0/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list