[Talk-GB] Zebra crossings being lost in iD - how to respond

[Silent Spike]

On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 1:26 PM Silent Spike <silentspike100 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> The crossing=marked/unmarked tagging is inspired from a proposal I
> believe, because there is ambiguity to the controlled/uncontrolled tagging
> whereas there's an explicit obvious answer as to whether a crossing has
> markings or not.
>

For those who can't see the slack archive (don't have an account) in my
last post, the discussion points to these proposals:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Unambiguous_crossings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing%3Dmarked
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/crossing:signals
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20191025/94391e99/attachment.html>