[Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops

[Tony OSM]

I think this is all premature. The shops still have the branding, they 
could be taken over by a new company operating as Thomas Cook. I Think 
that nothing should be done until there is greater clarity.

Tony Shield

TonyS999

On 24/09/2019 14:10, Tadeusz Cantwell wrote:
> Thanks, I have used once shop=vacant before, now that you mention it. 
> Will read up on the wiki to see the different intended uses for them. 
> The old_name is an interesting option.
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 14:00, Jez Nicholson <jez.nicholson at gmail.com 
> <mailto:jez.nicholson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I'm a fan of shop=vacant, old_name=Thomas Cook myself
>
>     You could argue for not:name=Thomas Cook maybe
>
>     On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, 13:34 Tadeusz Cantwell, <t4dc4n at gmail.com
>     <mailto:t4dc4n at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         I changed the three shops in N.I to disused;shop=travel-agent
>         since I wasn't sure what the best practice was in this case.
>         Not all of them had the wiki links etc. Any advice on a better
>         way?
>
>         Tad
>         _______________________________________________
>         Talk-GB mailing list
>         Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org>
>         https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190924/677acf82/attachment.html>