[Talk-GB] Subject: Re: Thomas Cook shops
Chris Hill
osm at raggedred.net
Tue Sep 24 13:47:16 UTC 2019
Thomas Cook shops are not vacant. They may not be open to the public
today, but they may well be reopened by a new owner in the future and
that may even be under the Thomas Cook brand if the administrator sells
some or all of them to another company. In the mean time they are still
branded and still a landmark of sorts.
If a shop is emptied or reused by another firm then change that one
otherwise I think we should wait for a while to see what happens.
cheers
Chris Hill (chillly)
On 24/09/2019 14:00, Jez Nicholson wrote:
> I'm a fan of shop=vacant, old_name=Thomas Cook myself
>
> You could argue for not:name=Thomas Cook maybe
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, 13:34 Tadeusz Cantwell, <t4dc4n at gmail.com
> <mailto:t4dc4n at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> I changed the three shops in N.I to disused;shop=travel-agent
> since I wasn't sure what the best practice was in this case. Not
> all of them had the wiki links etc. Any advice on a better way?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20190924/fbf28cec/attachment.html>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list