[Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Aug 14 20:17:50 UTC 2020
Aug 14, 2020, 15:53 by forums at david-woolley.me.uk:
> On 14/08/2020 12:46, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>> If signage on the ground is gone or never existed then route relation should not be mapped in OSM*.
>>
>
> In the long term, this could make OSM useless for motor traffic as there is a general policy of decluttering signs. One of the arguments for that is that everyone uses satellite navigators, so they don't need the signs. I think is also used as an argument for why it can take councils years to fix missing street name signs.
>
> If OSM relies on on the ground signage, when the authorities rely on virtual signage in online maps, it could lose a lot of roads!
>
At least in Poland it is purely theoretical issue while problem of nonexisting/proposed/gone
route relations cluttering map is real (local governments and organizations keep creating various
routes and later fail to maintain them).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20200814/6cf962bf/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Talk-GB
mailing list