[Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even
danstowell+osm at gmail.com
Thu Dec 10 19:11:30 UTC 2020
That JOSM rendering is just a limitation in JOSM's rendering - I'd
imagine it was unplanned.
I'd be happy to see that second solution (i.e. make clear the
interpretation of the tag, for closed ways). I don't necessarily think
it needs a proposal/vote but I'd be happy to see it happen!
Op do 10 dec. 2020 om 18:37 schreef ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
<talk-gb at openstreetmap.org>:
> Date: 10 Dec 2020, 18:34
> From: ipswichmapper at tutanota.com
> To: mattattlee at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] House number ranges that are only odd or even
> This issue also came to my mind. addr:interpolation on a building doesn't seem appropriate. JOSM, for example, renders it as a dotted line around the edge of the building (as if that is the addr:interpolation way). Clearly then, addr:interpolation isn't meant for buildings.
> Currently, I do 1;3;5;7;9 (here is an example of this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222193468/history [old versions of this building have that tagging scheme])
> Probably, a proposal needs to be created to either create a new tag or change addr:interpolation so that its meaning is different on closed and open ways.
> I think the latter solution is better, as people probably already tag buildings with an addr:interpolation.
> 10 Dec 2020, 15:37 by mattattlee at gmail.com:
> Is there a way when specifying a range for addr:housenumber to indicate it's only for even or odd numbers?
> When walking around my local area I have come across some blocks that will have a sign indicating for example house numbers 1 to 21 odd only. Similarly when there is just one building drawn for a whole street of terrace houses the number range will only be or odd even depending on the side of the road.
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-GB