[Talk-GB] Paths on Wimbledon Common

Silent Spike silentspike100 at gmail.com
Fri Jul 10 12:19:21 UTC 2020


The changeset comment seems backwards to me, foot=designated is more
specific than foot=yes (which would be the default for any mapped footpath).

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 1:12 PM Colin Smale <colin.smale at xs4all.nl> wrote:

> What does "legally accessible" mean? Are they Public Footpaths? Do we tag
> all Public Footpaths with an explicit "foot=yes" or is
> "designation=public_footpath" enough?
>
>
>
> On 2020-07-10 13:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
>
> I have been doing some tidying based on Osmose, including the warning for
> highway=footway foot=yes, which is often left over from a preset in
> Potlatch 1.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87672607
>
> I got a changeset comment querying the edit.
>
>
>
>    - I note you have removed foot=yes from highway=footway. My
>    understanding is that the default for a footway is foot=designated, but
>    designated requires an explicit sign. the paths on Wimbledon Common do not
>    have an explicit sign, but are legally accessible, hence foot=yes. Perhaps
>    osmose is wrong.
>    - Any comments?
>    - --
>    - Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20200710/a504a0f5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list