[Talk-GB] UPRN Locations Map

Nick nick at foresters.org
Sat Sep 26 14:29:19 UTC 2020


That is a good point and if the councils agree to publish under OGL, 
that would be ideal. Perhaps need to consider what data should be 
requested as a standard submission? For example, apart from the UPRN 
related data (i.e. whether parent/child, historic, provisional) the 
request could perhaps justifiably ask for a list of council land and 
property with addresses?

On 26/09/2020 14:27, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 26/09/2020 13:46, David Woolley wrote:
>> OS are in a funny position, in that they are in the public sector, 
>> but are expected to be self funding. To the extent that they succeed 
>> in the latter, they don't owe a duty to the taxpayer.
>
> But since the vast majority of the UPRN data is actually collected and 
> managed by the relevant councils, the question is do they have the 
> right to restrict access when it is council taxes that pay for the 
> management of that data and not OS! SHOULD we perhaps be asking the 
> various councils for direct access to the raw data under the open data 
> umbrella?
>



More information about the Talk-GB mailing list