[Talk-GB] Can we tag the Imber roads better with access:conditional?

Chris Hodges chris at c-hodges.co.uk
Sat Jan 2 15:49:51 UTC 2021


Thanks Richard,

Your fail-safety is a good point, and I agree that's a good way to look 
at it even though you're not likely to accidentally wander along the 
Imber road during firing as there are gates, usually guarded, so a 
detour rather than danger, but still to be avoided. This is unlike the 
byways further E where you have to watch out for red flags/lights; while 
they're more available than the Imber road they're still closed for 
firing at least as much as they're open, and tagged access=yes)

I'll have a go at a conditional tag - the current opening finishes 
tomorrow and the dates are published with fairly short notice, but at 
least it will give something to edit, and allow me to add a comment with 
the link

Funnily enough I was just using the query tool to check that yes indeed 
the Wiltshire Cycleway does pass through Somerset (Somerset being Tier 
4, this isn't allowed).


Chris

On 02/01/2021 14:31, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Chris Hodges wrote:
> > it doesn't feel right to imply it's always closed, especially as
> > similarly tagged roads in the area are always closed
>
> (For reference, Imber is perhaps open twice a year, once in summer for 
> around a week, once for a few days around New Year.)
>
> access=private is the situation that applies for 96% of the year. It 
> therefore makes more sense for this to be the base tag, rather than 
> access=yes. As well as being more accurate more often, it "fails safe" 
> in this scenario, which is pretty important given that for 96% of the 
> time soldiers are firing guns and driving tanks here.
>
> access:conditional= would be a good thing to add. You'd have to update 
> it each year when the MoD publish opening times but that should be 
> doable. It's a machine-readable tag and so whatever you put in there 
> should be machine-readable.
>
> > but is that exposed to users (for sake of argument,
> > someone going to openstreetmap.com)?
>
> Not directly, but you could always suggest it as a feature for the 
> default osm-carto rendering. You can, of course, find out more about 
> any feature on OSM using the "?" query features tool.
>
> Richard
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb





More information about the Talk-GB mailing list