[Talk-GB] Updating the playground area and relations in Hackney Downs park

Mat Attlee mattattlee at gmail.com
Sat Jan 2 18:20:37 UTC 2021


Well spotted. One of the gates was in my survey photos so I have added that
in and I'll add the others when I have time to do further surveys
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96819330

On Sat, 2 Jan 2021 at 17:38, Peter Neale <nealepb at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> It looks to me as though you have achieved what you wanted.
>
> My only comment would be that you don't seem to have tagged any gates in
> the fence.  From squinting at the aerial imagery, I THINK there might be
> one on the South side? I assume that you have better local knowledge than I
> do.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>
> On Saturday, 2 January 2021, 14:46:13 GMT, Mat Attlee <
> mattattlee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you all for the advice, I feel I have corrected the mapping of this
> now but if I've missed anything please me know
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96810510
>
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 19:55, Mat Attlee <mattattlee at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The building does not provide entry to the park, entry is only via the
> gates in the fence. The part of the building with the toilets is very much
> outside the playground, however the side of the building which faces the
> park has a small shelter and a mosaic inside it.
>
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 at 19:46, Dan S <danstowell+osm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mat
>
> To get into the building, are the doors within the playground or
> outside? If inside, then perhaps it makes sense to keep the relation
> in existence - to express the building being part of the playground
> site, even if it is at the edge. Otherwise, I guess I'd delete the
> relation, after copying its tags and pasting them onto the
> playground's way. (Deleting a relation is easy to do, just delete it -
> but only if you're sure!)
>
> In either case, you also move the building to its rightful place, and
> probably you'd want to join the building way onto the edge of the
> playground way, either by merging corresponding nodes together, or
> using the "join to way" tool in josm.
>
> I wonder why someone chose to map it using a relation, though -
> perhaps that is, after all, a good way to express the toilet block
> "belonging to" the playground?
>
> HTH
> Dan
>
> Op wo 30 dec. 2020 om 19:35 schreef Mat Attlee <mattattlee at gmail.com>:
> >
> > I am trying to correct the playground area for Hackney Downs park as the
> toilet building should be outside but connected to the playground as it
> forms part of the fence around it. The thing that is making this tricky is
> the area is modelled with relations which I am not familiar with but keen
> to learn more about.
> >
> > The node in question is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5552805
> and if anyone wants to make the change themselves my survey photos are here
> and I can take more if needed https://photos.app.goo.gl/QjgkwKbUKRq68jpq8
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-GB mailing list
> > Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210102/cbe4a847/attachment.htm>


More information about the Talk-GB mailing list