[Talk-GB] Completeness of cadastral parcel data

[Tom Crocker]

Thanks. I didn't mean redacted (like official secrets), I meant as you
described. I was wondering because Chevin forest park is a bit smaller than
I imagined in one location according to their own maps, and a cadastral
parcel boundary doesn't exist where they've drawn the edge. I was wondering
if it really is private land or if the council didn't know where the
boundary was.

I've also seen a few gaps in houses but so far only in council estates so
I'm guessing that's to do with right to buy and some are still owned by the
council.

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, 08:49 Jez Nicholson, <jez.nicholson at gmail.com> wrote:

> Land Registry has built up over time boundaries for properties that have
> changed hands in the last n (have to look up how far back it goes) years.
> So if it hasn't been sold, inherited, or deliberately registered then it'll
> be missing.....or do you mean "are any redacted?"
>
> I've spotted the occasional gap in normal rows of houses.
>
> Some details on
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Property_extents_in_the_United_Kingdom
> ...as usual, please update
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, 19:20 Tom Crocker, <tomcrockermail at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if there are property boundaries that wouldn't be shown?
>>
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, 12:34 Ken Kilfedder, <spiregrain_osm at ksglp.org.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just a note to say that LB Waltham Forest, Isle of Dogs and Poplar (in
>>> LB Tower Hamlets) and Greenwich have now appeared in the tiles; and a quick
>>> spot-check in Wandsworth show that its working too.
>>>
>>> Many thanks to all involved!
>>>
>>> ---
>>> https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?spiregrain
>>> spiregrain_osm at ksglp.org.uk
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, at 6:19 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote:
>>>
>>> > The data is published as one file per local authority, so I suspect
>>> it's just a technical issue on the OSMUK end.
>>>
>>> Correct.
>>>
>>> > The osmuk page about it asks for missing areas to be notified to
>>> info at osmuk.org
>>>
>>> Also correct. So far I have noted down Isle of Dogs, Greenwich, Poplar,
>>> Tower Hamlets, "LB Waltham Forest is largely absent", and Wandsworth.
>>>
>>> Whilst we do encourage you to report these, please do be patient with
>>> us. This layer is a volunteer driven initiative supported by a small number
>>> of people. If anyone would like to help with data refreshes etc, then also
>>> get in contact. I'm sure we can show you the ropes assuming you are
>>> comfortable with the basics of dealing with data on a server.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> *Rob*
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-GB mailing list
>>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-GB mailing list
>>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-GB mailing list
>> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/attachments/20210313/808275b8/attachment-0001.htm>